Although opponents argue that mobile technology is a distraction in the classroom, it should be beneficial for students and teachers with an appropriate way to use during classes. The first reason that using mobile technology should be allowed in the classroom is that it has been proved to strengthen the interaction and collaboration among students and teachers. Now,technology has changed, laptops and smartphones have become so popular. It may be true that traditional learning has been still adopted by a large number of schools and universities throughout the world. However, this doesn't mean that mobile learning can't bring benefits to education and be allowed in the classroom. Consequently, the conclusion is wrong. Moreover, the argument implies that mobile technology is most harmful to students' study compared to the past teaching. This is obviously not true. Therefore, th...
Many of currrent people consider that PEDs should be banned for competitors, just a few think of that can be harmless. Some athletes use drugs to win the competition, this causes a serious problem in society, as Bradbury (2012) states, "The problem is we can't set the penaities high enough to deter use effectively: getting away with it is just too valuable" (para.4) The situation is not only extremely dangerious to the sport system, but also could end those drug-using athletes' career, which would lead to turbulence to some parts of the society. Obviously, that athletes use drugs and cheat people is difficult to prevent. Moreover, the abusing of PEDs increase the health risks, "as I have listened to fighter discussing their performance-enhancing drug use, along with their accompanying heart, kidney, liver, bone, brain and psyhiatric ailment...